If you want to discover your genetic history and where you came from... you’ve found the right place!

888-806-2588

review of scientific and news articles on dna testing and popular genetics

Abraham's Children: A Review

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Implications for Jewish History and Genealogy

Article:  Gil Atzmon et al., “Abraham’s Children in the Genome Era:  Major Jewish Diaspora Populations Comprise Distinct Genetic Clusters with Shared Middle Eastern Ancestry,” The American Journal of Human Genetics 86 (June 11, 2010) 850-859.

This blog posting attempts to summarize this important article and translate its technical results into layman’s language for the sake of our customers. From the genetic evidence, we hope to glean some useful information about Jewish history and genealogy, especially for those who find they have “some” Jewish ancestry in their family tree but who are non-Jewish in the way they identify.

The eleven authors represent a stellar team of international researchers specializing in population genetics. The institutions involved are leading centers of genetics and biomedicine, starting with the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York and including Tel-Aviv University in Israel. Appearance in the American Journal of Human Genetics, a publication of the American Society of Human Genetics, assures prestige and finality of the highest order.

The study uses a new sample of 237 carefully qualified Jewish subjects, which it compares with data from the Human Genome Diversity Project started at Stanford in the 1990s, as well as the Population Reference Sample (PopRes) project, containing hundreds of thousands of SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms, used to differentiate genes that show heredity lines and disease linkage in populations).

The scale of the project is colossal, and it must have taken years to complete. Financial support came from private and public sources, including the U.S.-Israel Binational Science Foundation and NIH. It supersedes (while it confirms or clarifies) the two types of previous approaches to the problem: 1) genetics studies on blood groups from the 1970s, and 2) recent studies of Y chromosomal and mitochondrial haplotypes. The latter “uniparental” studies could only offer a limited view of the subject. This study uses autosomal DNA to its full advantage. The scientists had supercomputers and the latest tools in biostatistics at their disposal.

Material and Methods

The two cornerstones of any statistical study are reliability and validity. Experts would be challenged to find anything wrong with the reliability of “Abraham’s Children.” State-of-the-science genotyping, phylogeny, bootstrapping and GERMLINE algorithms are employed. But validity issues may be mentioned as likely to call some of the findings into slight question in some areas. Subjects were recruited in New York (Iranian, Iraqi, Syrian and Ashkenazi Jews), Seattle (Turkish Sephardic Jews), Greece (Greek Sephardic Jews) and Rome (Italian Jews). The main divisions into Italian, Ashkenazi, Syrian, Middle Eastern (termed Mizrahi, or Eastern, Jews here) can be seen in some instances to be question-begging, and there are equivocations in labels that might, conceivably, create “desired results.” Moreover, subjects “were included only if all four grandparents came from the same Jewish community.” Such a rule might have influenced one of the findings, namely, that “Jewish Communities Show High Levels of IBD,” or Informative By Descent shared segments of DNA (p. 855f.).

Notably, the conclusion that Ashkenazi Jews are highly inbred, with most being as close as 3rd or 4th cousins to each other, could be an effect of the sample selection from New York Ashkenazi Jews, who often emigrated together and belonged to the same synagogue for several generations. A larger, more randomized selection would have been better. The total number of Ashkenazi Jews used was only 34 persons.

Jews now living in Rome are not the same as Roman Jews. Traditional schemes of Jewry speak of the Romaniot Jews, but these were traditionally at home in the Byzantine Empire. Are Syrian Jews mostly Middle Eastern or are they another amalgam of émigrés and remnants? Where are Central Asian Jews like the large Uzbekistani population my local barber represents? The absence of Caucasian and Central Asian Jews may have affected the study’s rather resounding, over-confidant statement that it “refutes” the contention that Ashkenazi Jews have little Middle Eastern heritage and rather more of a contribution to their genetics from Khazars and Slavs. The study, like many, seems at pains to prove Middle Eastern connections of Ashkenazi Jews, who are the leading force in present-day Israel.

There are no German, Dutch, Spanish, Portuguese or English Jews in the study. “Ashkenazi” seems to represent Jews living in New York with rather uniform ancestry in Poland, Hungary, Ukraine, Lithuania and Russia. All Jews in the study seem to be of the “go to temple” (at least on the High Holy Days) sort, although no mention is made of religious orientation. Subjects were chosen because of their ostensibly “pure” Jewish roots.

Ashkenazi Jews at Yom Kippur in 19th century Central Europe from a painting by Gottlieb.

Seven Jewish population clusters are defined: 

  1. Irani Jews
  2. Iraqi Jews
  3. Syrian Jews
  4. Ashkenazi Jews
  5. Italian Jews
  6. Greek Jews
  7. Turkish Jews

These were sorted out into three major groups of the Jewish Diaspora:

  • Eastern European Ashkenazim
  • Italian, Greek and Turkish Sephardim
  • Iranian, Iraqi and Syrian Middle Easterners

How Different are Jews from Each Other? From Non-Jewish Populations?

Table 1 on page 853 shows Fst values, which indicate the degree of projected inbreeding within a cluster and allow one to make comparisons between clusters. If we look at the table of genetic diversity among Jews, we can pick out some of the following points of interest:

  • Ashkenazi Jews are very, very different genetically from Italian (Sephardic) Jews: genetic distance between the two populations is over 3.1, whereas that between Ashkenazi Jews and non-Jewish European populations such as Russian or French hardly ever goes above 1.0.

  • Syrian and Iraqi Jews are also very different from each other; Syrian Jews group together with European (Ashkenazi and Sephardic) Jews, a major finding of the study.

  • All Jewish populations, including Ashkenazim, resemble genetically the Druze, a Middle Eastern population that is still in its original place in Lebanon and Israel. Syrian and Turkish Jews (Sephardim) most resemble Druzes.

The study identifies two major groups of Jews, characterizing them as Middle Eastern Jews and European/Syrian Jews. Of the Middle Eastern Jews, the Irani and Iraqi were scarcely distinguishable. The Europeans have varying degrees of admixture with non-Jewish populations into which they have been dispersed. European Jews are 20-40% (or on another page, 30-60%) European, the study concludes, while Sephardic Jews have 8-11% North African (Berber) DNA. Italian, Syrian, Iranian and Iraqi Jews are the most inbred.

All these statistics “highlight the commonality of Jewish origin” and expose the Middle Eastern origins and genetic unity of Jewish people, even in dispersal from their homeland in ancient Israel.

The flipside of inbreeding is outbreeding or exogamy. If European Jews are highly admixed, by the same token, many Europeans must have some degree of Jewish admixture. Gene flow did not go just one way. What are the most outbred Jewish clusters according to the study? It is the Sephardic Jews from Italy, Greece and Turkey, with low rates of shared IBD and greater diversity than the Ashkenazim.

Lost Tribes Still Lost

 The brief Discussion section at the end of the article attempts to put the statistical findings together with an outline of Jewish history and resolve some of the mysteries of Jewish genetic makeup, chiefly the Khazar question. “Each of the Jewish populations formed its own cluster as part of the larger Jewish cluster,” the authors conclude. “Each group demonstrated Middle Eastern ancestry and variable admixture with European populations.”

Next, the authors attack the difficulty of determining when the major split between Eastern and Western Jewish groups occurred (with Syrians falling out with the Sephardim and Ashkenazim in the West, although intermediate in genetic distance with Middle Eastern Jews like the Iraqi and Irani). Based on IBD or calculations of shared genes on the front end or bottlenecks and back end or genetic drift, “a split between Middle Eastern Iraqi and Iranian Jews and European/Syrian Jews…is 100-150 generations [or] 2500 years ago.” They correlate this population divide with the Babylonian and Persian periods of Jewish history. These disturbances began in the 900s-800s BCE when the Kingdom of David fell apart into the Kingdom of Jerusalem and the Northern Kingdom (Samaria , Israel, Ephraim) and were finalized in the 6th century BCE when King Cyrus of Persia granted permission to the exiles to be repatriated from Babylon to Jerusalem.

In the shuffle, the so-called Lost Tribes representing the Northern Kingdom had been dispersed “beyond the river” into Central Asia, leaving the Judeans in the ascendancy in Israel. Although the authors do not explicity state it, the fact that Syrian Jews are several quantums’ length closer in affinity with European Jews than Middle Eastern Jews seems to reflect the historic Return to Zion and inauguration of the Second Temple in Jerusalem in 516 BCE and explain why European Jews, especially Sephardim, emphasize the House of David and Tribes of Levi in their traditional ancestral accounts. So far, the autosomal clock of change seems to beat with the march of history.

 

Khazar kingdom in the Middle Ages.

The article is clear about another thing, “the idea of non-Semitic Mediterranean ancestry in the formation of the European/Syrian Jewish groups,” attributing this to the mass conversions and proselytism during Greco-Roman times. It mentions that there were six million Jews in the Roman Empire, when Judaism accounted for 10% of the population. But here is where the authors’ sense of history begins to get fuzzy. They do not speak of medieval conversions or mention, for instance, the Jews of Visigothic and Berber Spain and Septimanian France and gloss over the huge Khazar conversion and expansion event, 600-1000 CE. Again, medieval history does not seem to be geneticists’ strength.

“Abraham’s Children” claims that the genetic composition of European/Syrian Jewish groups “is incompatible with theories that Ashkenazi Jews are for the most part the direct lineal descendants of converted Khazars or Slavs” (857). In this brief sentence are a number of fallacies, special pleading, misnomers, false assumptions, sleights of hand, straw arguments and equivocations. This blog  posting can only touch on the controversy, but to begin with, as we have seen, Ashkenazi Jews (n=34, all from New York) are lumped together with Sephardim and Syrian Jews as having Middle Eastern core pedigrees, even though they have the highest amount of local population admixture. Are Khazars the same as Slavs? Not ethnographically. They are sometimes treated as Middle Easterners and sometimes as Europeans or other interlopers in this article, but it doesn’t seem to matter really, because there are no Khazars in the study sample. The authors are thus stalking a phantom, which they duly track down and slay.

Ghost in the Machine

Using haplogroup studies, the authors raise the possibility of 12.5% non-Middle Eastern admixture per generation in Ashkenazi Jews (based on Hammer et al.). They also draw attention to the 7.5% frequency of haplogroup R1a1 among Ashkenazi Jews, a non-Middle Eastern, rather Eastern European male lineage. But R1a1 is not diagnostic of Khazars; try maybe G. R1a1 descendants are typically fair haired and light-eyed; Khazars had a Middle Eastern, Turkic appearance, with dark features.

In a sense, geneticists always seem to find support for what they set out to prove in the first place. It is small wonder that “Abraham’s Fathers” comes at the end of and completes a decades-long push by Big Science to legitimize Jewish claims to Middle Eastern roots. It is a splendid survey, the last in a long series, but it is not the final word on the subject. There are flaws both in the sampling and historical thinking.

The Thirteenth Tribe (1976) by Arthur Koestler, a Hungarian Ashkenazi Jewish author, advanced the thesis that the modern Jewish population in Central and Eastern Europe is not descended from the historical Israelites of antiquity, but from Khazars. This Turkic people of the Caucasus region converted to Judaism in the 8th century and moved into Russia, Hungary, Ukraine, Poland, Belarus, Lithuania and Germany during the 12th and 13th century when the Khazar Empire was collapsing. Koestler's work was founded on that of the French scholar Ernest Renan and set off a firestorm of controversy among Zionists. 

 

 

Comments

Please tell us what you think

Name, website, and email are optional; if we publish your comment, your name will be shown, and may be linked to your website if provided, but the email you enter will not be published.





Captcha Image


Recent Posts


Tags

Germany statistics England Tifaneg Nayarit Phoenicians Bode Technology Sam Kean Mucogee Creeks Zuni Indians Celts haplogroup C Mary Settegast human leukocyte antigens Daniel Defoe Theodore Steinberg Ziesmer, Zizmor mitochondrial DNA University of Leicester Wendell Paulson Anglo-Saxons FDA microsatellites Native American DNA Roma People Choctaw Indians Isabel Allende Genie Milgrom Thuya Nikola Tesla Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Kentucky Leicester Monica Sanowar Genome Sciences Building Discovery Channel Irish Central Middle Eastern DNA race ged.com Tucson crosses ethnic markers haplogroup R ethnicity phenotype Constantine Rafinesque DNA databases Teresa Panther-Yates FOX News Paleolithic Age Olmec Maronites Dienekes Anthropology Blog horizontal inheritance Genex Diagnostics Sonora alleles Cajuns Charles Darwin Ari Plost hoaxes Jalisco gedmatch crypto-Jews INORA Shlomo Sand Scientific American Anne C. Stone Cherokee DNA genomics labs India Abenaki Indians Jews Jesse Montes research evolution Anne Marie Fine Chris Tyler-Smith Wikipedia Svante Paabo Sir Joshua Reynolds Bill Tiffee Joel E. Harris District of Columbia Freemont Indians Mildred Gentry Monya Baker Denisovans Normans Peter Martyr genealogy haplogroup M Sizemore Indians Solutreans Scotland autosomal DNA Applied Epistemology palatal tori news American Journal of Human Genetics Ashkenazi Jews Anasazi Terry Gross Tutankamun oncology Holocaust Khoisan Miguel Gonzalez Jan Ravenspirit Franz American history Columbia University health and medicine Cancer Genome Atlas human leukocyte testing peopling of the Americas Sasquatch occipital bun John Butler Patrick Henry Stephen A. Leon Johnny Depp ethics National Health Laboratories Luca Pagani Myra Nichols Oxford Nanopore French Canadians Cherokee Freedmen New York Times European DNA Stone Age Anacostia Indians Britain giants MHC Science magazine John Wilwol Hohokam Basques Ancient Giantns Who Ruled America haplogroup J Italy Cismar Phoenix Pueblo Grande Museum aliyah Population genetics Riane Eisler Ancestry.com Bureau of Indian Affairs Finnish people Belgium Lebanon Michael Grant rock art Great Goddess Nephilim, Fritz Zimmerman N. Brent Kennedy Navajo Indians Algonquian Indians New York Review of Books John Ruskamp New Mexico Wales Rich Crankshaw George van der Merwede seafaring Bryan Sykes Les Miserables GlobalFiler Erika Chek Hayden familial Mediterranean fever Smithsonian Magazine Y chromosomal haplogroups Alia Garcia-Ureste Richard Lewontin When Scotland Was Jewish Henry IV Lithuania Melanesians Etruscans Virginia DeMarce immunology El Castillo cave paintings Maya China Arabic Texas A&M University metis Cohen Modal Haplotype Europe Indian Territory prehistory Yates surname Gypsies Henry VII Mary Kugler DNA security Patrick Pynes hominids Nadia Abu El-Haj Pueblo Indians Jewish novelists Dragging Canoe Rafael Falk Chauvet cave paintings haplogroup D Elizabeth C. Hirschman haplogroup Z Gustavo Ramirez Calderon corn myths DNA testing companies education B'nai Abraham David Cornish Daily News and Analysis Irish DNA CODIS markers Victor Hugo pheromones Richard III King Arthur, Tintagel, The Earliest Jews and Muslims of England and Wales Colin Pitchfork Zionism human migrations Echota Cherokee Tribe of Alabama Rutgers University consanguinity Smithsonian Institution Douglas C. Wallace ISOGG Rare Genes Irish history Kate Wong Ostenaco bloviators art history Bigfoot Janet Lewis Crain Penny Ferguson Donald N. Yates genetic determinism Valparaiso University Patagonia Kennewick Man Hispanic ancestry Mark Stoneking Russell Belk Asiatic Fathers of America Kurgan Culture Khazars Chuetas El Paso clan symbols haplogroup N Beringia Sinti archeology Slovakia James Shoemaker Discover magazine Bulgaria Native American DNA Test BBCNews Ireland Eric Wayner Ethel Cox Elizabeth DeLand personal genomics Hertfordshire Moundbuilders Thruston Tablet haplogroup W methylation Phyllis Starnes Hadassah Magazine Oxford Journal of Evolution Rush Limbaugh Indo-Europeans AP bar mitzvah Current Anthropology surnames Tintagel Israel Jewish contribution to world literature Magdalenian culture Carl Zimmer Douglas Preston pipe carving Sizemore surname haplogroup H EURO DNA Fingerprint Test Havasupai Indians Colin Renfrew Secret History of the Cherokee Indians Maui Kitty Prince of the Bear River Athabaskans Marie Cheng Richard Buckley Peter Parham FBI Melungeon Union Telltown Promega Ukraine Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute b'nei anousim Clovis breast cancer Panther's Lodge Micmac Indians Black Dutch Greeks Sea Peoples Michael Schwartz Nancy Gentry King Arthur admixture French DNA Sinaloa Cismaru mutation rate Early Jews and Muslims of England and Wales (book) James Stritzel far from the tree rapid DNA testing National Geographic Daily News Y chromosome DNA population genetics Ananya Mandal Elvis Presley DNA Eske Willerslev Helladic art Pima Indians Arabia North Carolina Life Technologies Old Souls in a New World Henriette Mertz Cooper surname Keros North African DNA Gunnar Thompson IntegenX Nature Communications Mother Qualla Old World Roots of the Cherokee Ripan Malhi Central Band of Cherokee Neolithic Revolution Black Irish Colima Israel, Shlomo Sand Caucasian Robinson Crusoe ENFSI Plato Middle Ages Gila River National Museum of Natural History Michoacan Kari Carpenter andrew solomon Cherokee DNA Project Satoshi Horai Acadians origins of art history of science megapopulations Melba Ketchum anthropology Stacy Schiff DNA Diagnostics Center Iran family history ancient DNA Juanita Sims Zizmer Bradshaw Foundation Timothy Bestor Family Tree DNA haplogroup X Joseph Jacobs Romania The Calalus Texts Austro-Hungary haplogroup T Lab Corp Pomponia Graecina Walter Plecker Akhenaten DNA Fingerprint Test New York Academy of Sciences Holocaust Database Silverbell Artifacts Stan Steiner Marija Gimbutas Harold Sterling Gladwin Waynesboro Pennsylvania Jack Goins Rebecca L. Cann epigenetics Sarmatians population isolates DNA magazine polydactylism forensics Science Daily, Genome Biol. Evol., Eran Elhaik, Khazarian Hypothesis, Rhineland Hypothesis powwows African DNA Nature Genetics Barack Obama Melungeons Jon Entine private allele cancer Muslims in American history London Hopi Indians Turkic DNA Cree Indians Melungeon Movement mummies Mexico Bering Land Bridge Bryony Jones medicine Arizona State University Tom Martin Scroft Alabama Arizona Austronesian, Filipinos, Australoid mental foramen Asian DNA religion genetic memory Antonio Torroni Washington D.C. Phillipe Charlier DNA Fingerprint Test Stephen Oppenheimer Barnard College Bentley surname research Brian Wilkes Charles Perou single nucleotide polymorphism Sorbs Tucson Panther's Lodge Publishers Society for Crypto-Judaic Studies Mark Thomas Richmond California university of North Carolina at Chapel Hill haplogroup E M. J. Harper First Peoples Louis XVI The Nation magazine Taino Indians Jewish GenWeb HapMap Tennessee Richard Dewhurst haplogroup G Alec Jeffreys Egyptians haplogroup L Odessa Shields Cox NPR linguistics William Byrd Ron Janke Neanderthals Stony Creek Baptist Church Central Band of Cherokees PNAS Joseph Andrew Park Wilson Albert Einstein College of Medicine haplogroup B Fritz Zimmerman Horatio Cushman Jews and Muslims in British Colonial America Jim Bentley Chromosomal Labs Bode Technology Melungeon Heritage Association haplogroup U Amy Harmon Chris Stringer Russia Philippa Langley Comanche Indians Mohawk George Starr-Bresette Gravettian culture BATWING Puerto Rico Grim Sleeper DNA Forums Wendy Roth Kari Schroeder Elzina Grimwood Navajo Cave art Early Jews of England and Wales climate change prehistoric art genetics 23andme Cleopatra Asiatic Echoes Salt River Charlotte Harris Reese Altai Turks Virginia genealogy Cornwall cannibalism X chromosome Gregory Mendel Harry Ostrer Hawaii Nova Scotia Jewish genetics Hohokam Indians Abraham Lincoln Epigraphic Society Majorca Roberta Estes Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Douglas Owsley clinical chemistry

Archive