If you want to discover your genetic history and where you came from... you’ve found the right place!

888-806-2588

review of scientific and news articles on dna testing and popular genetics

Abraham's Children: A Review

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Implications for Jewish History and Genealogy

Article:  Gil Atzmon et al., “Abraham’s Children in the Genome Era:  Major Jewish Diaspora Populations Comprise Distinct Genetic Clusters with Shared Middle Eastern Ancestry,” The American Journal of Human Genetics 86 (June 11, 2010) 850-859.

This blog posting attempts to summarize this important article and translate its technical results into layman’s language for the sake of our customers. From the genetic evidence, we hope to glean some useful information about Jewish history and genealogy, especially for those who find they have “some” Jewish ancestry in their family tree but who are non-Jewish in the way they identify.

The eleven authors represent a stellar team of international researchers specializing in population genetics. The institutions involved are leading centers of genetics and biomedicine, starting with the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York and including Tel-Aviv University in Israel. Appearance in the American Journal of Human Genetics, a publication of the American Society of Human Genetics, assures prestige and finality of the highest order.

The study uses a new sample of 237 carefully qualified Jewish subjects, which it compares with data from the Human Genome Diversity Project started at Stanford in the 1990s, as well as the Population Reference Sample (PopRes) project, containing hundreds of thousands of SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms, used to differentiate genes that show heredity lines and disease linkage in populations).

The scale of the project is colossal, and it must have taken years to complete. Financial support came from private and public sources, including the U.S.-Israel Binational Science Foundation and NIH. It supersedes (while it confirms or clarifies) the two types of previous approaches to the problem: 1) genetics studies on blood groups from the 1970s, and 2) recent studies of Y chromosomal and mitochondrial haplotypes. The latter “uniparental” studies could only offer a limited view of the subject. This study uses autosomal DNA to its full advantage. The scientists had supercomputers and the latest tools in biostatistics at their disposal.

Material and Methods

The two cornerstones of any statistical study are reliability and validity. Experts would be challenged to find anything wrong with the reliability of “Abraham’s Children.” State-of-the-science genotyping, phylogeny, bootstrapping and GERMLINE algorithms are employed. But validity issues may be mentioned as likely to call some of the findings into slight question in some areas. Subjects were recruited in New York (Iranian, Iraqi, Syrian and Ashkenazi Jews), Seattle (Turkish Sephardic Jews), Greece (Greek Sephardic Jews) and Rome (Italian Jews). The main divisions into Italian, Ashkenazi, Syrian, Middle Eastern (termed Mizrahi, or Eastern, Jews here) can be seen in some instances to be question-begging, and there are equivocations in labels that might, conceivably, create “desired results.” Moreover, subjects “were included only if all four grandparents came from the same Jewish community.” Such a rule might have influenced one of the findings, namely, that “Jewish Communities Show High Levels of IBD,” or Informative By Descent shared segments of DNA (p. 855f.).

Notably, the conclusion that Ashkenazi Jews are highly inbred, with most being as close as 3rd or 4th cousins to each other, could be an effect of the sample selection from New York Ashkenazi Jews, who often emigrated together and belonged to the same synagogue for several generations. A larger, more randomized selection would have been better. The total number of Ashkenazi Jews used was only 34 persons.

Jews now living in Rome are not the same as Roman Jews. Traditional schemes of Jewry speak of the Romaniot Jews, but these were traditionally at home in the Byzantine Empire. Are Syrian Jews mostly Middle Eastern or are they another amalgam of émigrés and remnants? Where are Central Asian Jews like the large Uzbekistani population my local barber represents? The absence of Caucasian and Central Asian Jews may have affected the study’s rather resounding, over-confidant statement that it “refutes” the contention that Ashkenazi Jews have little Middle Eastern heritage and rather more of a contribution to their genetics from Khazars and Slavs. The study, like many, seems at pains to prove Middle Eastern connections of Ashkenazi Jews, who are the leading force in present-day Israel.

There are no German, Dutch, Spanish, Portuguese or English Jews in the study. “Ashkenazi” seems to represent Jews living in New York with rather uniform ancestry in Poland, Hungary, Ukraine, Lithuania and Russia. All Jews in the study seem to be of the “go to temple” (at least on the High Holy Days) sort, although no mention is made of religious orientation. Subjects were chosen because of their ostensibly “pure” Jewish roots.

Ashkenazi Jews at Yom Kippur in 19th century Central Europe from a painting by Gottlieb.

Seven Jewish population clusters are defined: 

  1. Irani Jews
  2. Iraqi Jews
  3. Syrian Jews
  4. Ashkenazi Jews
  5. Italian Jews
  6. Greek Jews
  7. Turkish Jews

These were sorted out into three major groups of the Jewish Diaspora:

  • Eastern European Ashkenazim
  • Italian, Greek and Turkish Sephardim
  • Iranian, Iraqi and Syrian Middle Easterners

How Different are Jews from Each Other? From Non-Jewish Populations?

Table 1 on page 853 shows Fst values, which indicate the degree of projected inbreeding within a cluster and allow one to make comparisons between clusters. If we look at the table of genetic diversity among Jews, we can pick out some of the following points of interest:

  • Ashkenazi Jews are very, very different genetically from Italian (Sephardic) Jews: genetic distance between the two populations is over 3.1, whereas that between Ashkenazi Jews and non-Jewish European populations such as Russian or French hardly ever goes above 1.0.

  • Syrian and Iraqi Jews are also very different from each other; Syrian Jews group together with European (Ashkenazi and Sephardic) Jews, a major finding of the study.

  • All Jewish populations, including Ashkenazim, resemble genetically the Druze, a Middle Eastern population that is still in its original place in Lebanon and Israel. Syrian and Turkish Jews (Sephardim) most resemble Druzes.

The study identifies two major groups of Jews, characterizing them as Middle Eastern Jews and European/Syrian Jews. Of the Middle Eastern Jews, the Irani and Iraqi were scarcely distinguishable. The Europeans have varying degrees of admixture with non-Jewish populations into which they have been dispersed. European Jews are 20-40% (or on another page, 30-60%) European, the study concludes, while Sephardic Jews have 8-11% North African (Berber) DNA. Italian, Syrian, Iranian and Iraqi Jews are the most inbred.

All these statistics “highlight the commonality of Jewish origin” and expose the Middle Eastern origins and genetic unity of Jewish people, even in dispersal from their homeland in ancient Israel.

The flipside of inbreeding is outbreeding or exogamy. If European Jews are highly admixed, by the same token, many Europeans must have some degree of Jewish admixture. Gene flow did not go just one way. What are the most outbred Jewish clusters according to the study? It is the Sephardic Jews from Italy, Greece and Turkey, with low rates of shared IBD and greater diversity than the Ashkenazim.

Lost Tribes Still Lost

 The brief Discussion section at the end of the article attempts to put the statistical findings together with an outline of Jewish history and resolve some of the mysteries of Jewish genetic makeup, chiefly the Khazar question. “Each of the Jewish populations formed its own cluster as part of the larger Jewish cluster,” the authors conclude. “Each group demonstrated Middle Eastern ancestry and variable admixture with European populations.”

Next, the authors attack the difficulty of determining when the major split between Eastern and Western Jewish groups occurred (with Syrians falling out with the Sephardim and Ashkenazim in the West, although intermediate in genetic distance with Middle Eastern Jews like the Iraqi and Irani). Based on IBD or calculations of shared genes on the front end or bottlenecks and back end or genetic drift, “a split between Middle Eastern Iraqi and Iranian Jews and European/Syrian Jews…is 100-150 generations [or] 2500 years ago.” They correlate this population divide with the Babylonian and Persian periods of Jewish history. These disturbances began in the 900s-800s BCE when the Kingdom of David fell apart into the Kingdom of Jerusalem and the Northern Kingdom (Samaria , Israel, Ephraim) and were finalized in the 6th century BCE when King Cyrus of Persia granted permission to the exiles to be repatriated from Babylon to Jerusalem.

In the shuffle, the so-called Lost Tribes representing the Northern Kingdom had been dispersed “beyond the river” into Central Asia, leaving the Judeans in the ascendancy in Israel. Although the authors do not explicity state it, the fact that Syrian Jews are several quantums’ length closer in affinity with European Jews than Middle Eastern Jews seems to reflect the historic Return to Zion and inauguration of the Second Temple in Jerusalem in 516 BCE and explain why European Jews, especially Sephardim, emphasize the House of David and Tribes of Levi in their traditional ancestral accounts. So far, the autosomal clock of change seems to beat with the march of history.

 

Khazar kingdom in the Middle Ages.

The article is clear about another thing, “the idea of non-Semitic Mediterranean ancestry in the formation of the European/Syrian Jewish groups,” attributing this to the mass conversions and proselytism during Greco-Roman times. It mentions that there were six million Jews in the Roman Empire, when Judaism accounted for 10% of the population. But here is where the authors’ sense of history begins to get fuzzy. They do not speak of medieval conversions or mention, for instance, the Jews of Visigothic and Berber Spain and Septimanian France and gloss over the huge Khazar conversion and expansion event, 600-1000 CE. Again, medieval history does not seem to be geneticists’ strength.

“Abraham’s Children” claims that the genetic composition of European/Syrian Jewish groups “is incompatible with theories that Ashkenazi Jews are for the most part the direct lineal descendants of converted Khazars or Slavs” (857). In this brief sentence are a number of fallacies, special pleading, misnomers, false assumptions, sleights of hand, straw arguments and equivocations. This blog  posting can only touch on the controversy, but to begin with, as we have seen, Ashkenazi Jews (n=34, all from New York) are lumped together with Sephardim and Syrian Jews as having Middle Eastern core pedigrees, even though they have the highest amount of local population admixture. Are Khazars the same as Slavs? Not ethnographically. They are sometimes treated as Middle Easterners and sometimes as Europeans or other interlopers in this article, but it doesn’t seem to matter really, because there are no Khazars in the study sample. The authors are thus stalking a phantom, which they duly track down and slay.

Ghost in the Machine

Using haplogroup studies, the authors raise the possibility of 12.5% non-Middle Eastern admixture per generation in Ashkenazi Jews (based on Hammer et al.). They also draw attention to the 7.5% frequency of haplogroup R1a1 among Ashkenazi Jews, a non-Middle Eastern, rather Eastern European male lineage. But R1a1 is not diagnostic of Khazars; try maybe G. R1a1 descendants are typically fair haired and light-eyed; Khazars had a Middle Eastern, Turkic appearance, with dark features.

In a sense, geneticists always seem to find support for what they set out to prove in the first place. It is small wonder that “Abraham’s Fathers” comes at the end of and completes a decades-long push by Big Science to legitimize Jewish claims to Middle Eastern roots. It is a splendid survey, the last in a long series, but it is not the final word on the subject. There are flaws both in the sampling and historical thinking.

The Thirteenth Tribe (1976) by Arthur Koestler, a Hungarian Ashkenazi Jewish author, advanced the thesis that the modern Jewish population in Central and Eastern Europe is not descended from the historical Israelites of antiquity, but from Khazars. This Turkic people of the Caucasus region converted to Judaism in the 8th century and moved into Russia, Hungary, Ukraine, Poland, Belarus, Lithuania and Germany during the 12th and 13th century when the Khazar Empire was collapsing. Koestler's work was founded on that of the French scholar Ernest Renan and set off a firestorm of controversy among Zionists. 

 

 

Comments

Please tell us what you think

Name, website, and email are optional; if we publish your comment, your name will be shown, and may be linked to your website if provided, but the email you enter will not be published.





Captcha Image


Recent Posts


Tags

Joel E. Harris MHC gedmatch Rare Genes INORA Nadia Abu El-Haj Lithuania Ancient Giantns Who Ruled America Austro-Hungary microsatellites Hawaii genomics labs Virginia genealogy Kennewick Man Finnish people New York Times Altai Turks Alec Jeffreys Kari Schroeder Kentucky Colin Renfrew Jim Bentley Carl Zimmer Tifaneg Jan Ravenspirit Franz FBI Neolithic Revolution Middle Ages Sarmatians Mohawk Stan Steiner hoaxes Discovery Channel Native American DNA Test Gypsies Wendell Paulson Panther's Lodge Publishers England population isolates Douglas Preston haplogroup M breast cancer Ripan Malhi Theodore Steinberg El Castillo cave paintings FDA Hopi Indians Melungeon Heritage Association ged.com New Mexico peopling of the Americas Alabama Population genetics Chuetas Wales Beringia Stony Creek Baptist Church Tutankamun Gila River Navajo Indians Holocaust Database human leukocyte testing Asiatic Echoes Cajuns aliyah Comanche Indians mutation rate phenotype Nova Scotia Luca Pagani Sam Kean George Starr-Bresette Penny Ferguson Melungeons PNAS polydactylism Nikola Tesla Europe genealogy Phillipe Charlier Bill Tiffee Bureau of Indian Affairs Jewish genetics Denisovans Central Band of Cherokees Anacostia Indians Barnard College Great Goddess X chromosome race Cornwall Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Nancy Gentry Harold Goodwin Juanita Sims Jewish GenWeb origins of art Salt River Henry VII Mucogee Creeks Ashkenazi Jews Cancer Genome Atlas Hohokam Irish Central ethics Mother Qualla Holocaust Timothy Bestor rapid DNA testing Melungeon Movement religion Israel ethnic markers familial Mediterranean fever National Museum of Natural History Havasupai Indians giants ancient DNA family history DNA testing companies Muslims in American history M. J. Harper Ostenaco King Arthur, Tintagel, The Earliest Jews and Muslims of England and Wales Michael Grant Sir Joshua Reynolds Daily News and Analysis Anglo-Saxons Bentley surname research Ananya Mandal Douglas C. Wallace BATWING Iran Satoshi Horai Current Anthropology Italy human migrations corn Walter Plecker Stephen Oppenheimer mummies Hispanic ancestry Horatio Cushman B'nai Abraham Sinti archeology Stone Age university of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Svante Paabo Phoenix Ron Janke Asian DNA Nature Communications personal genomics Roberta Estes Maui Jesse Montes Irish history climate change Early Jews of England and Wales Colin Pitchfork India Daniel Defoe Smithsonian Magazine Central Band of Cherokee Anne Marie Fine Antonio Torroni Columbia University Charlotte Harris Reese Amy Harmon Belgium Y chromosome DNA Richard Buckley Science Daily, Genome Biol. Evol., Eran Elhaik, Khazarian Hypothesis, Rhineland Hypothesis genetic memory Kurgan Culture Erika Chek Hayden Karenn Worstell Thruston Tablet Valparaiso University private allele Puerto Rico Tom Martin Scroft Grim Sleeper anthropology Moundbuilders Sea Peoples Gravettian culture Mary Settegast Life Technologies Janet Lewis Crain Chris Tyler-Smith Patrick Henry forensics Turkic DNA American Journal of Human Genetics Ziesmer, Zizmor Lebanon Nature Genetics Hohokam Indians Ireland Chromosomal Labs Bode Technology Mexico Helladic art Pomponia Graecina Khazars Eske Willerslev Celts Tintagel Telltown Akhenaten National Geographic Daily News CODIS markers European DNA Peter Martyr Irish DNA Olmec Family Tree DNA medicine Bering Land Bridge New York Review of Books statistics Wikipedia Barack Obama David Cornish Early Jews and Muslims of England and Wales (book) Sorbs Gunnar Thompson Yates surname Britain BBCNews palatal tori Arabic Israel, Shlomo Sand far from the tree Richard Dewhurst Melanesians John Ruskamp alleles megapopulations Neanderthals Algonquian Indians Elzina Grimwood Johnny Depp Navajo American history Middle Eastern DNA Cree Indians London Promega Douglas Owsley Arizona Cohen Modal Haplotype Panther's Lodge Cismar Jon Entine linguistics GlobalFiler George van der Merwede Mildred Gentry Michoacan clan symbols IntegenX Nephilim, Fritz Zimmerman Micmac Indians admixture Patrick Pynes Black Irish Michael Schwartz EURO DNA Fingerprint Test King Arthur ENFSI National Health Laboratories District of Columbia French Canadians Romania Keros haplogroup J University of Leicester oncology ethnicity French DNA evolution Anne C. Stone Wendy Roth Cleopatra rock art Tucson Marie Cheng Chris Stringer genetics Charles Darwin Basques Shlomo Sand Zionism Rafael Falk Zizmer Henry IV Rebecca L. Cann Maya Peter Parham Mary Kugler Thuya Ancestry.com Colima N. Brent Kennedy Rich Crankshaw Asiatic Fathers of America crypto-Jews Harold Sterling Gladwin Zuni Indians Joseph Jacobs Sinaloa Phyllis Starnes Choctaw Indians ISOGG Pima Indians Rutgers University Cismaru NPR Paleolithic Age Leicester Virginia DeMarce Epigraphic Society Terry Gross Tennessee occipital bun Oxford Journal of Evolution hominids Jalisco powwows Melba Ketchum Greeks Gregory Mendel Bryony Jones Pueblo Grande Museum China Sonora health and medicine Taino Indians history of science Sizemore Indians prehistoric art Indian Territory metis Plato Louis XVI population genetics clinical chemistry Bryan Sykes Freemont Indians North Carolina Dragging Canoe FOX News immunology Rush Limbaugh Monica Sanowar genetic determinism Applied Epistemology mitochondrial DNA Ethel Cox Nayarit Richard Lewontin Robinson Crusoe Henriette Mertz Waynesboro Pennsylvania Scotland Solutreans Richard III Monya Baker Teresa Panther-Yates Science magazine haplogroup X Brian Wilkes epigenetics Jews Austronesian, Filipinos, Australoid Acadians prehistory Cave art Cherokee DNA Constantine Rafinesque consanguinity Dienekes Anthropology Blog haplogroup U DNA databases bar mitzvah Native American DNA haplogroup T Jewish contribution to world literature Jack Goins Arizona State University mental foramen Abraham Lincoln Indo-Europeans Genex Diagnostics Jewish novelists Texas A&M University DNA magazine Fritz Zimmerman Roma People James Shoemaker Magdalenian culture Society for Crypto-Judaic Studies Ari Plost Chauvet cave paintings Jone Entine Old World Roots of the Cherokee Richmond California Isabel Allende art history haplogroup D Egyptians haplogroup C Etruscans pipe carving haplogroup H Donald N. Yates seafaring Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Eric Wayner Majorca Odessa Shields Cox Oxford Nanopore Secret History of the Cherokee Indians Old Souls in a New World Clovis Ukraine Harry Ostrer cannibalism Kitty Prince of the Bear River Athabaskans Marija Gimbutas Washington D.C. Black Dutch haplogroup N Kari Carpenter Stacy Schiff education Bigfoot Hertfordshire Germany andrew solomon When Scotland Was Jewish Joseph Andrew Park Wilson Caucasian cancer Slovakia Russell Belk Kate Wong Pueblo Indians Discover magazine DNA Forums methylation Jews and Muslims in British Colonial America Cherokee DNA Project 23andme news human leukocyte antigens Russia Smithsonian Institution DNA security research DNA Diagnostics Center Lab Corp Philippa Langley Abenaki Indians haplogroup E Bode Technology Albert Einstein College of Medicine Genome Sciences Building New York Academy of Sciences John Butler Echota Cherokee Tribe of Alabama haplogroup B horizontal inheritance Elvis Presley DNA Y chromosomal haplogroups AP Mark Stoneking Riane Eisler surnames haplogroup Z single nucleotide polymorphism Charles Perou DNA Fingerprint Test North African DNA Melungeon Union John Wilwol haplogroup R Scientific American The Nation magazine Khoisan haplogroup L Bradshaw Foundation Victor Hugo Maronites Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma myths Sasquatch Elizabeth C. Hirschman Bulgaria Normans Les Miserables Phoenicians Arabia Cooper surname HapMap Patagonia haplogroup W DNA Fingerprint Test First Peoples Elizabeth DeLand Anasazi Sizemore surname pheromones Miguel Gonzalez William Byrd Cherokee Freedmen African DNA Mark Thomas bloviators James Stritzel autosomal DNA

Archive