If you want to discover your genetic history and where you came from... you’ve found the right place!

888-806-2588

review of scientific and news articles on dna testing and popular genetics

Abraham's Children: A Review

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Implications for Jewish History and Genealogy

Article:  Gil Atzmon et al., “Abraham’s Children in the Genome Era:  Major Jewish Diaspora Populations Comprise Distinct Genetic Clusters with Shared Middle Eastern Ancestry,” The American Journal of Human Genetics 86 (June 11, 2010) 850-859.

This blog posting attempts to summarize this important article and translate its technical results into layman’s language for the sake of our customers. From the genetic evidence, we hope to glean some useful information about Jewish history and genealogy, especially for those who find they have “some” Jewish ancestry in their family tree but who are non-Jewish in the way they identify.

The eleven authors represent a stellar team of international researchers specializing in population genetics. The institutions involved are leading centers of genetics and biomedicine, starting with the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York and including Tel-Aviv University in Israel. Appearance in the American Journal of Human Genetics, a publication of the American Society of Human Genetics, assures prestige and finality of the highest order.

The study uses a new sample of 237 carefully qualified Jewish subjects, which it compares with data from the Human Genome Diversity Project started at Stanford in the 1990s, as well as the Population Reference Sample (PopRes) project, containing hundreds of thousands of SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms, used to differentiate genes that show heredity lines and disease linkage in populations).

The scale of the project is colossal, and it must have taken years to complete. Financial support came from private and public sources, including the U.S.-Israel Binational Science Foundation and NIH. It supersedes (while it confirms or clarifies) the two types of previous approaches to the problem: 1) genetics studies on blood groups from the 1970s, and 2) recent studies of Y chromosomal and mitochondrial haplotypes. The latter “uniparental” studies could only offer a limited view of the subject. This study uses autosomal DNA to its full advantage. The scientists had supercomputers and the latest tools in biostatistics at their disposal.

Material and Methods

The two cornerstones of any statistical study are reliability and validity. Experts would be challenged to find anything wrong with the reliability of “Abraham’s Children.” State-of-the-science genotyping, phylogeny, bootstrapping and GERMLINE algorithms are employed. But validity issues may be mentioned as likely to call some of the findings into slight question in some areas. Subjects were recruited in New York (Iranian, Iraqi, Syrian and Ashkenazi Jews), Seattle (Turkish Sephardic Jews), Greece (Greek Sephardic Jews) and Rome (Italian Jews). The main divisions into Italian, Ashkenazi, Syrian, Middle Eastern (termed Mizrahi, or Eastern, Jews here) can be seen in some instances to be question-begging, and there are equivocations in labels that might, conceivably, create “desired results.” Moreover, subjects “were included only if all four grandparents came from the same Jewish community.” Such a rule might have influenced one of the findings, namely, that “Jewish Communities Show High Levels of IBD,” or Informative By Descent shared segments of DNA (p. 855f.).

Notably, the conclusion that Ashkenazi Jews are highly inbred, with most being as close as 3rd or 4th cousins to each other, could be an effect of the sample selection from New York Ashkenazi Jews, who often emigrated together and belonged to the same synagogue for several generations. A larger, more randomized selection would have been better. The total number of Ashkenazi Jews used was only 34 persons.

Jews now living in Rome are not the same as Roman Jews. Traditional schemes of Jewry speak of the Romaniot Jews, but these were traditionally at home in the Byzantine Empire. Are Syrian Jews mostly Middle Eastern or are they another amalgam of émigrés and remnants? Where are Central Asian Jews like the large Uzbekistani population my local barber represents? The absence of Caucasian and Central Asian Jews may have affected the study’s rather resounding, over-confidant statement that it “refutes” the contention that Ashkenazi Jews have little Middle Eastern heritage and rather more of a contribution to their genetics from Khazars and Slavs. The study, like many, seems at pains to prove Middle Eastern connections of Ashkenazi Jews, who are the leading force in present-day Israel.

There are no German, Dutch, Spanish, Portuguese or English Jews in the study. “Ashkenazi” seems to represent Jews living in New York with rather uniform ancestry in Poland, Hungary, Ukraine, Lithuania and Russia. All Jews in the study seem to be of the “go to temple” (at least on the High Holy Days) sort, although no mention is made of religious orientation. Subjects were chosen because of their ostensibly “pure” Jewish roots.

Ashkenazi Jews at Yom Kippur in 19th century Central Europe from a painting by Gottlieb.

Seven Jewish population clusters are defined: 

  1. Irani Jews
  2. Iraqi Jews
  3. Syrian Jews
  4. Ashkenazi Jews
  5. Italian Jews
  6. Greek Jews
  7. Turkish Jews

These were sorted out into three major groups of the Jewish Diaspora:

  • Eastern European Ashkenazim
  • Italian, Greek and Turkish Sephardim
  • Iranian, Iraqi and Syrian Middle Easterners

How Different are Jews from Each Other? From Non-Jewish Populations?

Table 1 on page 853 shows Fst values, which indicate the degree of projected inbreeding within a cluster and allow one to make comparisons between clusters. If we look at the table of genetic diversity among Jews, we can pick out some of the following points of interest:

  • Ashkenazi Jews are very, very different genetically from Italian (Sephardic) Jews: genetic distance between the two populations is over 3.1, whereas that between Ashkenazi Jews and non-Jewish European populations such as Russian or French hardly ever goes above 1.0.

  • Syrian and Iraqi Jews are also very different from each other; Syrian Jews group together with European (Ashkenazi and Sephardic) Jews, a major finding of the study.

  • All Jewish populations, including Ashkenazim, resemble genetically the Druze, a Middle Eastern population that is still in its original place in Lebanon and Israel. Syrian and Turkish Jews (Sephardim) most resemble Druzes.

The study identifies two major groups of Jews, characterizing them as Middle Eastern Jews and European/Syrian Jews. Of the Middle Eastern Jews, the Irani and Iraqi were scarcely distinguishable. The Europeans have varying degrees of admixture with non-Jewish populations into which they have been dispersed. European Jews are 20-40% (or on another page, 30-60%) European, the study concludes, while Sephardic Jews have 8-11% North African (Berber) DNA. Italian, Syrian, Iranian and Iraqi Jews are the most inbred.

All these statistics “highlight the commonality of Jewish origin” and expose the Middle Eastern origins and genetic unity of Jewish people, even in dispersal from their homeland in ancient Israel.

The flipside of inbreeding is outbreeding or exogamy. If European Jews are highly admixed, by the same token, many Europeans must have some degree of Jewish admixture. Gene flow did not go just one way. What are the most outbred Jewish clusters according to the study? It is the Sephardic Jews from Italy, Greece and Turkey, with low rates of shared IBD and greater diversity than the Ashkenazim.

Lost Tribes Still Lost

 The brief Discussion section at the end of the article attempts to put the statistical findings together with an outline of Jewish history and resolve some of the mysteries of Jewish genetic makeup, chiefly the Khazar question. “Each of the Jewish populations formed its own cluster as part of the larger Jewish cluster,” the authors conclude. “Each group demonstrated Middle Eastern ancestry and variable admixture with European populations.”

Next, the authors attack the difficulty of determining when the major split between Eastern and Western Jewish groups occurred (with Syrians falling out with the Sephardim and Ashkenazim in the West, although intermediate in genetic distance with Middle Eastern Jews like the Iraqi and Irani). Based on IBD or calculations of shared genes on the front end or bottlenecks and back end or genetic drift, “a split between Middle Eastern Iraqi and Iranian Jews and European/Syrian Jews…is 100-150 generations [or] 2500 years ago.” They correlate this population divide with the Babylonian and Persian periods of Jewish history. These disturbances began in the 900s-800s BCE when the Kingdom of David fell apart into the Kingdom of Jerusalem and the Northern Kingdom (Samaria , Israel, Ephraim) and were finalized in the 6th century BCE when King Cyrus of Persia granted permission to the exiles to be repatriated from Babylon to Jerusalem.

In the shuffle, the so-called Lost Tribes representing the Northern Kingdom had been dispersed “beyond the river” into Central Asia, leaving the Judeans in the ascendancy in Israel. Although the authors do not explicity state it, the fact that Syrian Jews are several quantums’ length closer in affinity with European Jews than Middle Eastern Jews seems to reflect the historic Return to Zion and inauguration of the Second Temple in Jerusalem in 516 BCE and explain why European Jews, especially Sephardim, emphasize the House of David and Tribes of Levi in their traditional ancestral accounts. So far, the autosomal clock of change seems to beat with the march of history.

 

Khazar kingdom in the Middle Ages.

The article is clear about another thing, “the idea of non-Semitic Mediterranean ancestry in the formation of the European/Syrian Jewish groups,” attributing this to the mass conversions and proselytism during Greco-Roman times. It mentions that there were six million Jews in the Roman Empire, when Judaism accounted for 10% of the population. But here is where the authors’ sense of history begins to get fuzzy. They do not speak of medieval conversions or mention, for instance, the Jews of Visigothic and Berber Spain and Septimanian France and gloss over the huge Khazar conversion and expansion event, 600-1000 CE. Again, medieval history does not seem to be geneticists’ strength.

“Abraham’s Children” claims that the genetic composition of European/Syrian Jewish groups “is incompatible with theories that Ashkenazi Jews are for the most part the direct lineal descendants of converted Khazars or Slavs” (857). In this brief sentence are a number of fallacies, special pleading, misnomers, false assumptions, sleights of hand, straw arguments and equivocations. This blog  posting can only touch on the controversy, but to begin with, as we have seen, Ashkenazi Jews (n=34, all from New York) are lumped together with Sephardim and Syrian Jews as having Middle Eastern core pedigrees, even though they have the highest amount of local population admixture. Are Khazars the same as Slavs? Not ethnographically. They are sometimes treated as Middle Easterners and sometimes as Europeans or other interlopers in this article, but it doesn’t seem to matter really, because there are no Khazars in the study sample. The authors are thus stalking a phantom, which they duly track down and slay.

Ghost in the Machine

Using haplogroup studies, the authors raise the possibility of 12.5% non-Middle Eastern admixture per generation in Ashkenazi Jews (based on Hammer et al.). They also draw attention to the 7.5% frequency of haplogroup R1a1 among Ashkenazi Jews, a non-Middle Eastern, rather Eastern European male lineage. But R1a1 is not diagnostic of Khazars; try maybe G. R1a1 descendants are typically fair haired and light-eyed; Khazars had a Middle Eastern, Turkic appearance, with dark features.

In a sense, geneticists always seem to find support for what they set out to prove in the first place. It is small wonder that “Abraham’s Fathers” comes at the end of and completes a decades-long push by Big Science to legitimize Jewish claims to Middle Eastern roots. It is a splendid survey, the last in a long series, but it is not the final word on the subject. There are flaws both in the sampling and historical thinking.

The Thirteenth Tribe (1976) by Arthur Koestler, a Hungarian Ashkenazi Jewish author, advanced the thesis that the modern Jewish population in Central and Eastern Europe is not descended from the historical Israelites of antiquity, but from Khazars. This Turkic people of the Caucasus region converted to Judaism in the 8th century and moved into Russia, Hungary, Ukraine, Poland, Belarus, Lithuania and Germany during the 12th and 13th century when the Khazar Empire was collapsing. Koestler's work was founded on that of the French scholar Ernest Renan and set off a firestorm of controversy among Zionists. 

 

 

Comments

Please tell us what you think

Name, website, and email are optional; if we publish your comment, your name will be shown, and may be linked to your website if provided, but the email you enter will not be published.





Captcha Image


Recent Posts


Tags

Maronites Stephen Oppenheimer Russell Belk Rutgers University human migrations haplogroup H haplogroup R Richard Lewontin ethnicity Pueblo Grande Museum EURO DNA Fingerprint Test Magdalenian culture Stony Creek Baptist Church Eske Willerslev Nayarit Cooper surname Population genetics Dienekes Anthropology Blog Cave art Nancy Gentry genomics labs Mother Qualla Michael Schwartz Native American DNA Zizmer Discovery Channel Genome Sciences Building Oxford Nanopore Anasazi Plato Stan Steiner climate change Ron Janke Rare Genes Barack Obama BATWING Cancer Genome Atlas Richard III Finnish people Sizemore Indians peopling of the Americas linguistics Phoenicians Douglas Owsley Navajo Henry VII Constantine Rafinesque Ancient Giantns Who Ruled America Cleopatra 23andme Patrick Pynes crypto-Jews Britain INORA population genetics Bryan Sykes Israel, Shlomo Sand history of science Genie Milgrom Current Anthropology Brian Wilkes pheromones Washington D.C. Michael Grant Jon Entine Austro-Hungary Science Daily, Genome Biol. Evol., Eran Elhaik, Khazarian Hypothesis, Rhineland Hypothesis Tintagel Telltown Abenaki Indians Genex Diagnostics prehistoric art New York Review of Books Salt River Slovakia David Reich Mark Stoneking consanguinity Abraham Lincoln University of Leicester New Mexico DNA Forums Kentucky Puerto Rico autosomal DNA FDA El Paso Jews Middle Ages Bulgaria Satoshi Horai Paleolithic Age pipe carving Cherokee Freedmen Hopi Indians Black Irish Wales ENFSI Hawaii Mark Thomas Gravettian culture George Starr-Bresette Alia Garcia-Ureste Israel American Journal of Human Genetics Amy Harmon Choctaw Indians African DNA Kari Schroeder Panther's Lodge Publishers CODIS markers prehistory haplogroup X Bill Tiffee Arabia Anne Marie Fine Virginia genealogy Joseph Jacobs Great Goddess Timothy Bestor Stone Age Wikipedia Silverbell Artifacts university of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Jack Goins Bigfoot Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act John Butler gedmatch Etruscans genetic determinism Cajuns North African DNA methylation Caucasian Europe genetic memory William Byrd Mucogee Creeks Thuya Hertfordshire DNA Fingerprint Test epigenetics Beringia Science magazine China Columbia University Mildred Gentry private allele cancer Gregory Mendel Eric Wayner Jim Bentley Nadia Abu El-Haj The Nation magazine mutation rate oncology Tifaneg Donald N. Yates Sorbs Richard Dewhurst Victor Hugo Rebecca L. Cann Colin Pitchfork Ashkenazi Jews Sir Joshua Reynolds Stacy Schiff Anglo-Saxons Family Tree DNA Turkic DNA Bryony Jones Helladic art Charlotte Harris Reese Russia Life Technologies American history Chromosomal Labs Bode Technology National Geographic Daily News Smithsonian Magazine Asiatic Fathers of America Greeks The Calalus Texts far from the tree Valparaiso University health and medicine Ancestry.com John Wilwol Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Nature Communications hoaxes haplogroup J DNA testing companies Terry Gross Chris Tyler-Smith Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Freemont Indians AP Olmec Panther's Lodge Patrick Henry Kurgan Culture haplogroup L haplogroup C immunology alleles ISOGG Cohen Modal Haplotype Wendell Paulson Luca Pagani Colima Charles Perou James Stritzel Asian DNA ged.com human leukocyte antigens Elizabeth DeLand Epigraphic Society Cismaru Melba Ketchum myths Janet Lewis Crain DNA databases anthropology Gila River Leicester Illumina archeology haplogroup U First Peoples population isolates Pueblo Indians aliyah French DNA single nucleotide polymorphism Early Jews and Muslims of England and Wales (book) Jan Ravenspirit Franz Central Band of Cherokee Marie Cheng Robinson Crusoe Barnard College Riane Eisler Bode Technology Asiatic Echoes Henriette Mertz Clovis Richmond California Hohokam Roma People haplogroup E Sinaloa Scotland surnames human leukocyte testing haplogroup N Daily News and Analysis Muslims in American history Chauvet cave paintings Melungeon Heritage Association Joseph Andrew Park Wilson Melanesians Douglas C. Wallace Akhenaten Ari Plost Old World Roots of the Cherokee Cree Indians Dragging Canoe Chris Stringer Holocaust Nature Genetics Teresa Panther-Yates Mexico Old Souls in a New World X chromosome FBI Maui bar mitzvah Arizona State University Sea Peoples Phyllis Starnes personal genomics FOX News HapMap Melungeons Bentley surname research Wendy Roth Gustavo Ramirez Calderon Mary Settegast Rafael Falk Monica Sanowar art history Grim Sleeper Bering Land Bridge Normans Kate Wong Irish Central India Les Miserables Jalisco haplogroup B Sasquatch Indo-Europeans James Shoemaker Jewish genetics Bureau of Indian Affairs research Sinti medicine Carl Zimmer b'nei anousim Walter Plecker Middle Eastern DNA MHC powwows French Canadians King Arthur, Tintagel, The Earliest Jews and Muslims of England and Wales metis megapopulations Mary Kugler cannibalism Gypsies Italy Austronesian, Filipinos, Australoid Harold Sterling Gladwin Rush Limbaugh Romania Phillipe Charlier Tom Martin Scroft Juanita Sims bloviators M. J. Harper Y chromosome DNA news Algonquian Indians Albert Einstein College of Medicine Sonora Kitty Prince of the Bear River Athabaskans Henry IV Havasupai Indians Denisovans District of Columbia Myra Nichols Maya haplogroup Z Philippa Langley Theodore Steinberg IntegenX John Ruskamp Peter Martyr Zionism Melungeon Union horizontal inheritance Jews and Muslims in British Colonial America Fritz Zimmerman Patagonia familial Mediterranean fever King Arthur Neolithic Revolution Oxford Journal of Evolution genealogy ancient DNA Horatio Cushman Society for Crypto-Judaic Studies Gunnar Thompson Lebanon London Svante Paabo Acadians Virginia DeMarce Shlomo Sand Khoisan Holocaust Database Monya Baker Arizona Daniel Defoe Chuetas Rich Crankshaw Promega Cismar clan symbols corn Navajo Indians mental foramen Thruston Tablet ethnic markers Comanche Indians mitochondrial DNA admixture haplogroup G Khazars Elizabeth C. Hirschman phenotype Waynesboro Pennsylvania palatal tori Marija Gimbutas Echota Cherokee Tribe of Alabama evolution Early Jews of England and Wales Jewish contribution to world literature polydactylism Zuni Indians Phoenix origins of art Odessa Shields Cox Belgium Anacostia Indians Micmac Indians Discover magazine Harry Ostrer Pomponia Graecina Smithsonian Institution BBCNews Iran National Health Laboratories Ukraine PNAS Lab Corp New York Times andrew solomon haplogroup D Cornwall Hispanic ancestry Tucson NPR David Cornish Egyptians seafaring Alec Jeffreys Scientific American Yates surname Moundbuilders Ostenaco clinical chemistry Basques ethics haplogroup T haplogroup W DNA Diagnostics Center rock art Hadassah Magazine Tutankamun Y chromosomal haplogroups Miguel Gonzalez Michoacan mummies Colin Renfrew European DNA haplogroup M Elvis Presley DNA When Scotland Was Jewish education Bradshaw Foundation Johnny Depp Altai Turks hominids Jewish GenWeb Secret History of the Cherokee Indians Elzina Grimwood Cherokee DNA Neanderthals forensics genetics Richard Buckley family history Irish history Alabama Black Dutch Central Band of Cherokees microsatellites Penny Ferguson Jewish novelists Sam Kean Roberta Estes Cherokee DNA Project Sizemore surname Arabic rapid DNA testing B'nai Abraham Nikola Tesla Mohawk Applied Epistemology Louis XVI Stephen A. Leon N. Brent Kennedy DNA magazine breast cancer GlobalFiler Kennewick Man Ananya Mandal North Carolina Solutreans Nova Scotia Hohokam Indians New York Academy of Sciences Tennessee DNA Fingerprint Test National Museum of Natural History Peter Parham England Ripan Malhi Native American DNA Test Pima Indians Ziesmer, Zizmor race Erika Chek Hayden Majorca statistics Tucson crosses Lithuania Douglas Preston George van der Merwede occipital bun Charles Darwin Nephilim, Fritz Zimmerman Melungeon Movement Jesse Montes El Castillo cave paintings Isabel Allende Keros Antonio Torroni Sarmatians Joel E. Harris giants Ethel Cox Indian Territory DNA security Taino Indians Anne C. Stone Germany Celts Kari Carpenter Irish DNA Ireland Texas A&M University religion

Archive