If you want to discover your genetic history and where you came from... you’ve found the right place!

888-806-2588

review of scientific and news articles on dna testing and popular genetics

Abraham's Children: A Review

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Implications for Jewish History and Genealogy

Article:  Gil Atzmon et al., “Abraham’s Children in the Genome Era:  Major Jewish Diaspora Populations Comprise Distinct Genetic Clusters with Shared Middle Eastern Ancestry,” The American Journal of Human Genetics 86 (June 11, 2010) 850-859.

This blog posting attempts to summarize this important article and translate its technical results into layman’s language for the sake of our customers. From the genetic evidence, we hope to glean some useful information about Jewish history and genealogy, especially for those who find they have “some” Jewish ancestry in their family tree but who are non-Jewish in the way they identify.

The eleven authors represent a stellar team of international researchers specializing in population genetics. The institutions involved are leading centers of genetics and biomedicine, starting with the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York and including Tel-Aviv University in Israel. Appearance in the American Journal of Human Genetics, a publication of the American Society of Human Genetics, assures prestige and finality of the highest order.

The study uses a new sample of 237 carefully qualified Jewish subjects, which it compares with data from the Human Genome Diversity Project started at Stanford in the 1990s, as well as the Population Reference Sample (PopRes) project, containing hundreds of thousands of SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms, used to differentiate genes that show heredity lines and disease linkage in populations).

The scale of the project is colossal, and it must have taken years to complete. Financial support came from private and public sources, including the U.S.-Israel Binational Science Foundation and NIH. It supersedes (while it confirms or clarifies) the two types of previous approaches to the problem: 1) genetics studies on blood groups from the 1970s, and 2) recent studies of Y chromosomal and mitochondrial haplotypes. The latter “uniparental” studies could only offer a limited view of the subject. This study uses autosomal DNA to its full advantage. The scientists had supercomputers and the latest tools in biostatistics at their disposal.

Material and Methods

The two cornerstones of any statistical study are reliability and validity. Experts would be challenged to find anything wrong with the reliability of “Abraham’s Children.” State-of-the-science genotyping, phylogeny, bootstrapping and GERMLINE algorithms are employed. But validity issues may be mentioned as likely to call some of the findings into slight question in some areas. Subjects were recruited in New York (Iranian, Iraqi, Syrian and Ashkenazi Jews), Seattle (Turkish Sephardic Jews), Greece (Greek Sephardic Jews) and Rome (Italian Jews). The main divisions into Italian, Ashkenazi, Syrian, Middle Eastern (termed Mizrahi, or Eastern, Jews here) can be seen in some instances to be question-begging, and there are equivocations in labels that might, conceivably, create “desired results.” Moreover, subjects “were included only if all four grandparents came from the same Jewish community.” Such a rule might have influenced one of the findings, namely, that “Jewish Communities Show High Levels of IBD,” or Informative By Descent shared segments of DNA (p. 855f.).

Notably, the conclusion that Ashkenazi Jews are highly inbred, with most being as close as 3rd or 4th cousins to each other, could be an effect of the sample selection from New York Ashkenazi Jews, who often emigrated together and belonged to the same synagogue for several generations. A larger, more randomized selection would have been better. The total number of Ashkenazi Jews used was only 34 persons.

Jews now living in Rome are not the same as Roman Jews. Traditional schemes of Jewry speak of the Romaniot Jews, but these were traditionally at home in the Byzantine Empire. Are Syrian Jews mostly Middle Eastern or are they another amalgam of émigrés and remnants? Where are Central Asian Jews like the large Uzbekistani population my local barber represents? The absence of Caucasian and Central Asian Jews may have affected the study’s rather resounding, over-confidant statement that it “refutes” the contention that Ashkenazi Jews have little Middle Eastern heritage and rather more of a contribution to their genetics from Khazars and Slavs. The study, like many, seems at pains to prove Middle Eastern connections of Ashkenazi Jews, who are the leading force in present-day Israel.

There are no German, Dutch, Spanish, Portuguese or English Jews in the study. “Ashkenazi” seems to represent Jews living in New York with rather uniform ancestry in Poland, Hungary, Ukraine, Lithuania and Russia. All Jews in the study seem to be of the “go to temple” (at least on the High Holy Days) sort, although no mention is made of religious orientation. Subjects were chosen because of their ostensibly “pure” Jewish roots.

Ashkenazi Jews at Yom Kippur in 19th century Central Europe from a painting by Gottlieb.

Seven Jewish population clusters are defined: 

  1. Irani Jews
  2. Iraqi Jews
  3. Syrian Jews
  4. Ashkenazi Jews
  5. Italian Jews
  6. Greek Jews
  7. Turkish Jews

These were sorted out into three major groups of the Jewish Diaspora:

  • Eastern European Ashkenazim
  • Italian, Greek and Turkish Sephardim
  • Iranian, Iraqi and Syrian Middle Easterners

How Different are Jews from Each Other? From Non-Jewish Populations?

Table 1 on page 853 shows Fst values, which indicate the degree of projected inbreeding within a cluster and allow one to make comparisons between clusters. If we look at the table of genetic diversity among Jews, we can pick out some of the following points of interest:

  • Ashkenazi Jews are very, very different genetically from Italian (Sephardic) Jews: genetic distance between the two populations is over 3.1, whereas that between Ashkenazi Jews and non-Jewish European populations such as Russian or French hardly ever goes above 1.0.

  • Syrian and Iraqi Jews are also very different from each other; Syrian Jews group together with European (Ashkenazi and Sephardic) Jews, a major finding of the study.

  • All Jewish populations, including Ashkenazim, resemble genetically the Druze, a Middle Eastern population that is still in its original place in Lebanon and Israel. Syrian and Turkish Jews (Sephardim) most resemble Druzes.

The study identifies two major groups of Jews, characterizing them as Middle Eastern Jews and European/Syrian Jews. Of the Middle Eastern Jews, the Irani and Iraqi were scarcely distinguishable. The Europeans have varying degrees of admixture with non-Jewish populations into which they have been dispersed. European Jews are 20-40% (or on another page, 30-60%) European, the study concludes, while Sephardic Jews have 8-11% North African (Berber) DNA. Italian, Syrian, Iranian and Iraqi Jews are the most inbred.

All these statistics “highlight the commonality of Jewish origin” and expose the Middle Eastern origins and genetic unity of Jewish people, even in dispersal from their homeland in ancient Israel.

The flipside of inbreeding is outbreeding or exogamy. If European Jews are highly admixed, by the same token, many Europeans must have some degree of Jewish admixture. Gene flow did not go just one way. What are the most outbred Jewish clusters according to the study? It is the Sephardic Jews from Italy, Greece and Turkey, with low rates of shared IBD and greater diversity than the Ashkenazim.

Lost Tribes Still Lost

 The brief Discussion section at the end of the article attempts to put the statistical findings together with an outline of Jewish history and resolve some of the mysteries of Jewish genetic makeup, chiefly the Khazar question. “Each of the Jewish populations formed its own cluster as part of the larger Jewish cluster,” the authors conclude. “Each group demonstrated Middle Eastern ancestry and variable admixture with European populations.”

Next, the authors attack the difficulty of determining when the major split between Eastern and Western Jewish groups occurred (with Syrians falling out with the Sephardim and Ashkenazim in the West, although intermediate in genetic distance with Middle Eastern Jews like the Iraqi and Irani). Based on IBD or calculations of shared genes on the front end or bottlenecks and back end or genetic drift, “a split between Middle Eastern Iraqi and Iranian Jews and European/Syrian Jews…is 100-150 generations [or] 2500 years ago.” They correlate this population divide with the Babylonian and Persian periods of Jewish history. These disturbances began in the 900s-800s BCE when the Kingdom of David fell apart into the Kingdom of Jerusalem and the Northern Kingdom (Samaria , Israel, Ephraim) and were finalized in the 6th century BCE when King Cyrus of Persia granted permission to the exiles to be repatriated from Babylon to Jerusalem.

In the shuffle, the so-called Lost Tribes representing the Northern Kingdom had been dispersed “beyond the river” into Central Asia, leaving the Judeans in the ascendancy in Israel. Although the authors do not explicity state it, the fact that Syrian Jews are several quantums’ length closer in affinity with European Jews than Middle Eastern Jews seems to reflect the historic Return to Zion and inauguration of the Second Temple in Jerusalem in 516 BCE and explain why European Jews, especially Sephardim, emphasize the House of David and Tribes of Levi in their traditional ancestral accounts. So far, the autosomal clock of change seems to beat with the march of history.

 

Khazar kingdom in the Middle Ages.

The article is clear about another thing, “the idea of non-Semitic Mediterranean ancestry in the formation of the European/Syrian Jewish groups,” attributing this to the mass conversions and proselytism during Greco-Roman times. It mentions that there were six million Jews in the Roman Empire, when Judaism accounted for 10% of the population. But here is where the authors’ sense of history begins to get fuzzy. They do not speak of medieval conversions or mention, for instance, the Jews of Visigothic and Berber Spain and Septimanian France and gloss over the huge Khazar conversion and expansion event, 600-1000 CE. Again, medieval history does not seem to be geneticists’ strength.

“Abraham’s Children” claims that the genetic composition of European/Syrian Jewish groups “is incompatible with theories that Ashkenazi Jews are for the most part the direct lineal descendants of converted Khazars or Slavs” (857). In this brief sentence are a number of fallacies, special pleading, misnomers, false assumptions, sleights of hand, straw arguments and equivocations. This blog  posting can only touch on the controversy, but to begin with, as we have seen, Ashkenazi Jews (n=34, all from New York) are lumped together with Sephardim and Syrian Jews as having Middle Eastern core pedigrees, even though they have the highest amount of local population admixture. Are Khazars the same as Slavs? Not ethnographically. They are sometimes treated as Middle Easterners and sometimes as Europeans or other interlopers in this article, but it doesn’t seem to matter really, because there are no Khazars in the study sample. The authors are thus stalking a phantom, which they duly track down and slay.

Ghost in the Machine

Using haplogroup studies, the authors raise the possibility of 12.5% non-Middle Eastern admixture per generation in Ashkenazi Jews (based on Hammer et al.). They also draw attention to the 7.5% frequency of haplogroup R1a1 among Ashkenazi Jews, a non-Middle Eastern, rather Eastern European male lineage. But R1a1 is not diagnostic of Khazars; try maybe G. R1a1 descendants are typically fair haired and light-eyed; Khazars had a Middle Eastern, Turkic appearance, with dark features.

In a sense, geneticists always seem to find support for what they set out to prove in the first place. It is small wonder that “Abraham’s Fathers” comes at the end of and completes a decades-long push by Big Science to legitimize Jewish claims to Middle Eastern roots. It is a splendid survey, the last in a long series, but it is not the final word on the subject. There are flaws both in the sampling and historical thinking.

The Thirteenth Tribe (1976) by Arthur Koestler, a Hungarian Ashkenazi Jewish author, advanced the thesis that the modern Jewish population in Central and Eastern Europe is not descended from the historical Israelites of antiquity, but from Khazars. This Turkic people of the Caucasus region converted to Judaism in the 8th century and moved into Russia, Hungary, Ukraine, Poland, Belarus, Lithuania and Germany during the 12th and 13th century when the Khazar Empire was collapsing. Koestler's work was founded on that of the French scholar Ernest Renan and set off a firestorm of controversy among Zionists. 

 

 

Comments

Please tell us what you think

Name, website, and email are optional; if we publish your comment, your name will be shown, and may be linked to your website if provided, but the email you enter will not be published.





Captcha Image


Recent Posts


Tags

Thuya Jews and Muslims in British Colonial America climate change Olmec John Wilwol hominids Navajo IntegenX The Nation magazine Bryan Sykes Population genetics INORA Iran Cismar Sorbs Central Band of Cherokee Charles Darwin Nikola Tesla Muslims in American history Anglo-Saxons Philippa Langley National Health Laboratories HapMap Cherokee DNA Project Eric Wayner Holocaust Database mental foramen powwows Richard Buckley Kari Carpenter Jone Entine Shlomo Sand CODIS markers Ancient Giantns Who Ruled America Nancy Gentry Colin Pitchfork archeology Anacostia Indians Les Miserables Cave art prehistoric art Oxford Nanopore megapopulations Timothy Bestor Jack Goins Genex Diagnostics Nadia Abu El-Haj Jesse Montes Sizemore surname Gregory Mendel peopling of the Americas Asian DNA Science magazine Kari Schroeder Kitty Prince of the Bear River Athabaskans Middle Ages horizontal inheritance Arabic Bigfoot Ananya Mandal PNAS pheromones Denisovans bloviators Altai Turks Epigraphic Society Bering Land Bridge Odessa Shields Cox Native American DNA Paleolithic Age Y chromosome DNA Michoacan BATWING Cancer Genome Atlas Valparaiso University Khazars Belgium Russell Belk Jewish novelists Russia Nature Communications Jalisco Pima Indians family history Joseph Andrew Park Wilson Texas A&M University health and medicine Society for Crypto-Judaic Studies Holocaust Cherokee DNA Richmond California Smithsonian Institution haplogroup X Solutreans familial Mediterranean fever Virginia genealogy Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Kennewick Man Bill Tiffee consanguinity palatal tori Fritz Zimmerman Mother Qualla District of Columbia Nayarit African DNA myths DNA security Bradshaw Foundation Zuni Indians Native American DNA Test Ireland David Cornish Monya Baker cannibalism Maui Dragging Canoe Teresa Panther-Yates Virginia DeMarce Tennessee Phillipe Charlier Bode Technology Colin Renfrew Zizmer Richard Dewhurst Charles Perou Normans Indian Territory King Arthur, Tintagel, The Earliest Jews and Muslims of England and Wales Cooper surname Stacy Schiff Elizabeth C. Hirschman mummies Douglas C. Wallace Chuetas Isabel Allende ethics Tucson Ari Plost Pueblo Grande Museum methylation Peter Parham Austro-Hungary immunology Wales Current Anthropology Keros Middle Eastern DNA Wendell Paulson Columbia University Alec Jeffreys N. Brent Kennedy Black Irish Albert Einstein College of Medicine occipital bun Michael Schwartz Plato Penny Ferguson King Arthur Lebanon Abenaki Indians Chromosomal Labs Bode Technology Israel, Shlomo Sand Barnard College Mexico FBI Austronesian, Filipinos, Australoid Arizona State University Gravettian culture Cajuns Y chromosomal haplogroups Daily News and Analysis Kate Wong Phyllis Starnes Karenn Worstell Navajo Indians Havasupai Indians Chris Tyler-Smith Cornwall breast cancer Brian Wilkes Mucogee Creeks Hertfordshire Ukraine Hohokam Indians Anne Marie Fine Nephilim, Fritz Zimmerman Hopi Indians Carl Zimmer Sasquatch Terry Gross Svante Paabo origins of art Moundbuilders Rebecca L. Cann Ancestry.com 23andme Smithsonian Magazine haplogroup Z Constantine Rafinesque polydactylism Donald N. Yates far from the tree Phoenicians ISOGG bar mitzvah DNA databases Irish DNA MHC Kurgan Culture Patrick Henry Stone Age Central Band of Cherokees Telltown ancient DNA Mary Settegast Mark Stoneking microsatellites NPR Erika Chek Hayden FOX News Wendy Roth Discovery Channel Stony Creek Baptist Church forensics National Museum of Natural History Turkic DNA Juanita Sims Marija Gimbutas Helladic art single nucleotide polymorphism Rush Limbaugh Jan Ravenspirit Franz Henry IV Melungeon Union Indo-Europeans Rich Crankshaw haplogroup U French Canadians Arabia Irish Central Chauvet cave paintings Colima American Journal of Human Genetics Choctaw Indians university of North Carolina at Chapel Hill haplogroup H Jews Patagonia Melungeon Heritage Association Barack Obama Pomponia Graecina haplogroup E Ron Janke hoaxes When Scotland Was Jewish Jewish GenWeb evolution haplogroup D ethnic markers First Peoples haplogroup W Horatio Cushman Bulgaria Gunnar Thompson Acadians Tifaneg New York Academy of Sciences Roberta Estes Life Technologies Celts Melungeons George Starr-Bresette alleles London history of science Anasazi human migrations Peter Martyr genetics Phoenix DNA Forums George van der Merwede Bryony Jones Theodore Steinberg Magdalenian culture haplogroup L European DNA Sea Peoples Majorca Abraham Lincoln Stephen Oppenheimer Melba Ketchum Scotland Sinti John Butler Cleopatra Sonora Great Goddess Early Jews and Muslims of England and Wales (book) Sarmatians Luca Pagani Science Daily, Genome Biol. Evol., Eran Elhaik, Khazarian Hypothesis, Rhineland Hypothesis Kentucky Arizona race GlobalFiler Gypsies Ashkenazi Jews Echota Cherokee Tribe of Alabama Alabama DNA magazine Khoisan Cohen Modal Haplotype North African DNA Tintagel Yates surname Europe Neolithic Revolution Zionism Rutgers University Stan Steiner Mark Thomas Nova Scotia Maronites haplogroup N FDA Rare Genes clinical chemistry Akhenaten Ripan Malhi DNA Fingerprint Test Comanche Indians Patrick Pynes AP Charlotte Harris Reese EURO DNA Fingerprint Test Hohokam haplogroup R Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act American history DNA testing companies Anne C. Stone Joseph Jacobs Douglas Owsley Janet Lewis Crain human leukocyte testing genomics labs Sam Kean Britain Bentley surname research Puerto Rico Rafael Falk Harold Sterling Gladwin ENFSI clan symbols Amy Harmon haplogroup M Sizemore Indians Tom Martin Scroft medicine Etruscans personal genomics Finnish people Algonquian Indians linguistics Irish history Jon Entine El Castillo cave paintings Satoshi Horai Greeks Maya genealogy seafaring Grim Sleeper Chris Stringer Italy Israel epigenetics surnames Gila River Harold Goodwin genetic memory Jewish contribution to world literature Waynesboro Pennsylvania Victor Hugo Neanderthals Clovis Sir Joshua Reynolds crypto-Jews mutation rate Monica Sanowar China Asiatic Fathers of America Joel E. Harris mitochondrial DNA Eske Willerslev anthropology B'nai Abraham New York Times Walter Plecker admixture Riane Eisler James Shoemaker Elizabeth DeLand Scientific American haplogroup B Panther's Lodge Publishers Roma People Henry VII prehistory Daniel Defoe North Carolina BBCNews Germany haplogroup T Mildred Gentry Cherokee Freedmen Old Souls in a New World research Dienekes Anthropology Blog Early Jews of England and Wales oncology Douglas Preston Richard III Washington D.C. William Byrd Elvis Presley DNA Caucasian DNA Fingerprint Test art history Antonio Torroni Marie Cheng Elzina Grimwood Louis XVI Cismaru haplogroup C Family Tree DNA New York Review of Books Egyptians news Slovakia National Geographic Daily News DNA Diagnostics Center Wikipedia Sinaloa Freemont Indians Promega X chromosome Micmac Indians French DNA New Mexico rock art Robinson Crusoe Melanesians andrew solomon ethnicity corn Applied Epistemology population genetics University of Leicester Panther's Lodge Discover magazine Tutankamun Ostenaco religion Black Dutch Genome Sciences Building Secret History of the Cherokee Indians Nature Genetics Ziesmer, Zizmor Bureau of Indian Affairs statistics Oxford Journal of Evolution Leicester cancer Romania Beringia Henriette Mertz education rapid DNA testing Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Johnny Depp phenotype Harry Ostrer Taino Indians Lithuania Jim Bentley human leukocyte antigens England India Ethel Cox M. J. Harper Basques haplogroup J Mary Kugler Miguel Gonzalez genetic determinism Michael Grant Hispanic ancestry Jewish genetics Hawaii giants autosomal DNA aliyah population isolates Richard Lewontin Pueblo Indians Melungeon Movement Lab Corp private allele Salt River

Archive