If you want to discover your genetic history and where you came from... you’ve found the right place!

888-806-2588

review of scientific and news articles on dna testing and popular genetics

Jewish Marker I Signature of European Admixture

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Jewish I is described as "the most common of the three markers . . . its frequency highest in Poles, Russians, Germans, Hungarians, Romanians and Slavic peoples who intermarried with Ashkenazi Jews. It also appears in Italian, Spanish, Portuguese and Moroccan Jews (Sephardim)." This means it is a marker of general European admixture. But where is it most common, and where did the European Jews it identifies originate? Where were they concentrated in earliest times?

Statistical searches in ENFSI provide some tantalizing answers. Jewish I is found at a relatively high frequency throughout Europe but at elevated levels in Poland, Portugal and Belgium. It is lowest in Italy and Finland.

This would suggest that Jewish ancestry and intermarriage was common in countries where the population still carries this admixture marker.


Comments

stw commented on 29-Nov-2010 08:25 PM

According to DNA Ances. Comm. post, the Jewish marker I is basically Slavic, one must note that there was very large Slavic slave presence in Moorish Spain and Turkey, which may explain the presence of this marker in Sephardic Jews:

“researchers estimate that altogether more than 3 million people, predominantly Ukrainians but also Circassians, Russians, Belarusians, Poles and Jews were captured and enslaved during the time of the Crimean Khanate.”

Also since its inception, the Muslim religion permitted and encouraged marriage or slave concubinage of Muslim men with Jewish women in areas under their political dominion.
Its early history is basically one of conversion of Arabic speaking Israelites into a reformed Judaism more loyal to the Jewish Torah origins (or so it claims). Distinguishing middle eastern Jews and Muslims of this period is then rather unscientific since they share the same family origins.

Therefore DNA Jewish marker I is likely to be merely a broad marker for Slavic regions adjacent to Islamic conquests, which included regions populated by Jews.. Its presence in North African populations most likely relates to the Islamic white slave trade. This is important for the Jewish marker II, which is described as a non-unique marker common to many in the Middle East, meaning it refers to the peoples of Mediterranean civilization from Turkey to North Africa. It is therefore mislabeled as a Jewish marker, rather it is a representative of the Mediterranean civilization pre-Islam, and pre- rabbinic Judaism (which flourished later in the Islamic caliphates and Moorish Spain).

All of this is consistent with current research, and linguistic research on Yiddish (Paul Wexler), that shows Ashkenazi populations to be rather recent admixtures of Slavo Turkic peoples., while Sephardim are indistinguishable from the admixture of Slavic slaves, Berbers, and Arabs known as Moors.

Ellin Iselin commented on 06-Jan-2011 08:32 AM

Recommended reading for Jewish I: Living Together, Living Apart: Rethinking Jewish-Christian Relations in the Middle Ages, by Jonathan Elukin
http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8406.html


Please tell us what you think

Name, website, and email are optional; if we publish your comment, your name will be shown, and may be linked to your website if provided, but the email you enter will not be published.





Captcha Image

Bookmark and Share

Recent Posts


Tags

genetics ethnic markers immunology genealogy Maronites China BATWING corn Arizona State University Russia Turkic DNA Current Anthropology Michael Grant Pueblo Indians clan symbols Keros Cajuns Zuni Indians Sorbs FOX News Stone Age epigenetics Helladic art medicine Arabic health and medicine religion Joseph Jacobs Telltown Chris Stringer King Arthur cannibalism Wendy Roth Bradshaw Foundation Plato Cohen Modal Haplotype ethnicity Oxford Nanopore history of science Bryan Sykes Elizabeth C. Hirschman Theodore Steinberg Neanderthals Charles Darwin Wales Iran Nikola Tesla India megapopulations ethics haplogroup U Normans Hohokam Indians Donald N. Yates Arabia Italy haplogroup T Gregory Mendel prehistory Melungeons Alabama Panther's Lodge Maya Cornwall Hopi Indians Nova Scotia Etruscans INORA Gypsies Basques Y chromosomal haplogroups human leukocyte antigens Y chromosome DNA Middle Eastern DNA Austronesian, Filipinos, Australoid seafaring population isolates Cherokee DNA Akhenaten Riane Eisler Kentucky Abenaki Indians haplogroup E Pima Indians ancient DNA DNA Fingerprint Test haplogroup X statistics Dienekes Anthropology Blog DNA Forums Middle Ages Micmac Indians Magdalenian culture Irish history Choctaw Indians DNA Fingerprint Test Mary Settegast Acadians George van der Merwede Gravettian culture Jews and Muslims in British Colonial America Population genetics French DNA Britain George Starr-Bresette Chuetas Melanesians Colin Renfrew Anne Marie Fine American history Melungeon Heritage Association Tintagel Teresa Panther-Yates Ireland Lebanon Phyllis Starnes Majorca Belgium occipital bun DNA testing companies rock art Shlomo Sand Peter Parham Ashkenazi Jews Denisovans mitochondrial DNA haplogroup J Caucasian Roma People Native American DNA mental foramen Anasazi population genetics climate change education haplogroup B Havasupai Indians Barack Obama Great Goddess Khazars archeology Kurgan Culture BBCNews genomics labs Finnish people Sea Peoples Tifaneg African DNA forensics Jews Melungeon Union Europe linguistics Stephen Oppenheimer Indo-Europeans Marija Gimbutas Jone Entine HapMap M. J. Harper Greeks surnames French Canadians Bode Technology personal genomics Paleolithic Age Abraham Lincoln Stacy Schiff Tutankamun anthropology human migrations myths evolution England Asian DNA Applied Epistemology Jewish genetics Phoenicians Cleopatra N. Brent Kennedy Freemont Indians Neolithic Revolution Celts news European DNA Gunnar Thompson EURO DNA Fingerprint Test North African DNA Algonquian Indians autosomal DNA Egyptians Anglo-Saxons Native American DNA Test

Archive